![]() Maybe I misunderstood you and you really meant that's just not yet at your shortlist. Why not fair? You told me latency is no problem for you since plugins don't cause a noticable delay. Yes, it's a problem, but not a common one, and one that might never be solved completely anyway due to the requirement that programs/plugins accurately report their latency. ![]() The fact of the matter is, there are very few programs and plugins that actually introduce any latecny at all-and, when they, do, they usually don't report it in any way that would allow it to be compensated for. I believe it has been updated since then, but I have not had the time or the need to dig into it and find out if it's been sufficiently fixed to actually allow for port-level latency compensation. In the end, I ran into an unfortunate barrier: the JACK latency reporting API was completely useless for actually doing what it claimed. I spent a good deal of effort thinking about and working on latency compensation in Non. It's accepted and in the source code now. My solution at the moment is to live with Rosegarden's lack of latency compensation for audio tracks and shift them accordingly.įor Rosegarden users: My tiny patch to fix an off-by-one latency compensation bug will be included in the next release as I understand. Plugins like 10 band graphical EQ or autotalent do have a noticeble delay. When I irc'd with non's author (I guess he was it it turned out that latency isn't a problem for some programmers. Rosegarden doesn't do latency compensation for audio tracks, Ardour for subgroups. Even integrated DAWs don't do it properly. The second part seems to be an ever-unfulfilled wish. ġ.) the whole setup can be saved/restored with all its settingsĢ.) there is a working latency compensationen overall It's fine to have one-job-one-tool-stuff if. I don't think the funding is itself the cause of the problem, but it definitely allows for problems that might not otherwise arise. So the NON stuff looks like the right direction. We need things that work together but are in distinct modules. The more I've learned about the FLOSS world, the more I think lean-modular-yet-integrated is ideal. Most functionalities will work installing from the Ubuntu Software Center, but if you do find anything missing, you should consider installing the packages supplied directly by the Ardour website.Wolftune wrote:I agree mostly. In general, the Ardour project recommends having an already installed and set up the Jack server and only then installing the Ardour package ( Figure 3). Thus, Ardour works only with an installed and properly running Jack audio server, and the video function requires special video player software. These distribution packages are in a real love-hate relationship with Ardour's chief developer Paul Davis, because the complex suite requires a matching environment and a setup that not all maintainers might implement. Many SourcesĪrdour is available in most distribution repositories, some of which require including special multimedia package sources. If you want to optimize your system consistently and properly for audio, the Linux Audio wiki has a complete guide. In many cases, this approach leads to problems when Jack and its helper programs run in /usr/local Jack inventor Paul Davis warns against installing Jack from the sources themselves. You do this by assigning the user to the audio However, there's no way around requiring special privileges for the audio mode. Jack and Ardour run satisfactorily on a normal desktop kernel. Optimizing the kernel is now merely recommended, whereas it used to be an absolute requirement. On the software side, Ardour requires a running Jack server. ![]() However, increasing the project size to 20 tracks made the interface rather sluggish in our test, but fortunately did not affect the independent audio engine. For example, Ubuntu, needs just 2GB RAM to work with the DAW. Figure 2: Apart from many new synthesizers, many small, well-designed effects are included, such as this simple but clear distorter from dRowAudio.Īrdour's elaborately equipped GTK interface nevertheless requires relatively few system resources.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |